Hi,
I am working with NGL and I am defining the depreciation areas, and according to the user requisition I see I will have many depreciation areas, and the maintenance is going to be very difficult.
The company uses group currency and hard currency. It is working with NGL, ledger 0L is IFRS and L1 is local accounting. They have really few differences between IFRS and Local in Asset accounting, but they want to consider the ledger logic in AA because possibles future differences. According to that I get the following depreciation areas
01-IFRS Area- Ledger 0L- posting indicator 1
03-IFRS Revaluation Area 1 - Ledger 0L- Posting indicator 1
11-IFRS-Revaluation Area 2 -Ledger 0L-Posting indicator 1
10-IFRS-Inflation Area-Ledger 0L-Posting indicador 1
12-IFRS-IFRS W/Inflation Area-Ledger (01 + 10)
14-IFRS Total area (01 + 03 + 10 +11)
15-TAX area (does not post)
31- IFRS Area group curreny
32-IFRS Area hard currency
41-IFRS rev.area 1 group curenyc
42-IFRS rev area 1 hard currency
50-IFRS rev area 2 group currency
51'IFRS rev area 2 hard currency
52- IFRS inflation area g.c
53-IFRS inflation area hard currency
70-Local Area - Ledger N1- Posting indicator 3
71-Local area revaluation 1-Ledger N1-Posting indicador 3
72-Local area revaluation 2-Ledger N1-Posting indicador 3
73-Local area inflation area-Ledger N1-Posting indicador 3
74'Local area w inflation (70 +73)
75-Total local area (70+71+72+73)
76-Delta área (01-70)- Ledger N1- posting indicadtor 6
77-Delta área (03-71)- Ledger N1- posting indicadtor 6
78-Delta área (10-72)- Ledger N1- posting indicadtor 6
79-Delta área (11-73)- Ledger N1- posting indicadtor 6
So, As you can see there are many depreciation areas, and I think this will be very difficul for maintenance.
Any idea if I can reduce the number with any other configuration? The revaluation and inflation areas only will manage values for the past, and not calculate new values. It is ok if I configure them with indicador 2, 4 or 5 and I do not create the delta areas 77, 78 and 79) ?
I do not know if I can have a problem with this kind of configuration of these areas, I am trying to get an easier chart of depreciation, specially considering that the differences are very few.
Thanks.
Cecilia